IN REVIEW

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Mood Disorder: A Review and Comparison With Electroconvulsive Therapy
Gary Hasey, MD, FRCPC, MSc1

Objective:  To review repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a mode of therapy for depression.
Method:  The following aspects of rTMS were reviewed and compared with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): history, basic principles, technical considerations, possible mode of action, safety, adverse effects, and effects on mood in both healthy individuals and those suffering from bipolar disorder (BD) or depression.
Results:  rTMS may selectively increase or decrease neuronal activity over discrete brain regions. As a result of this focused intervention with TMS, the potential for unwanted side effects is substantially reduced, compared with ECT. In open trials, rTMS and ECT are reported to be equally efficacious for patients having depression without psychosis, but the therapeutic benefits reported in double-blind sham-rTMS controlled trials are more modest.
Conclusion:  The antidepressant and antimanic effects of rTMS depend on technical considerations such as stimulus frequency, intensity, and magnetic coil placement, which may not yet be optimized. Biological heterogeneity among the patients treated with rTMS may also contribute to differing efficacy across clinical trials. rTMS may possess tremendous potential as a treatment for mood disorder, but this has not yet been realized. rTMS must still be regarded as an experimental intervention requiring further refinement.

(Can J Psychiatry 2001;46:720–727)

Key Words:  transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, electroconvulsive therapy


Any discussion of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) inevitably involves the use of superlatives. ECT is the oldest of all biological treatments for psychopathology, the most effective for severe depression, and the most controversial. Since ECT was introduced in 1938, major advances in our understanding of neurophysiology and psychopathology, together with some serendipity, have led to many new pharmacologic treatments for depression. Nevertheless, as many as 1 in 5 patients with depression fail to respond to antidepressant medication (1,2). While ECT may be effective for these patients, its cognitive side effects and invasive nature make ECT unacceptable to many. New approaches to treating severe medication-resistant depression are needed.

Apart from psychotherapy, which may not be appropriate for patients with the most severe depression, few nonpharmacologic alternatives to antidepressant medications exist.


Manuscript received and accepted
June 2001.
1Clinical Director, Regional Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Address for correspondence: Dr G Hasey, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton,
Centre for Mountain Health, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7


Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), an experimental adjunctive treatment for epilepsy (3,4), has been reported to have antidepressant effects in an open trial (5). The device requires surgical implantation, however, and double-blind controlled clinical trials demonstrating antidepressant efficacy are still lacking. Another new technology that holds promise as a treatment for mood disorder, and is somewhat better-studied than VNS, is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS, which employs magnetic energy to alter cortical neuronal activity, has been shown to have significant antidepressant efficacy in several randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled TMS trials (6–8).

TMS Background

Brief History

Although attempts to create an electromagnetic brain stimulator date back to the 19th century, an effective TMS device was first built in 1985 by Anthony Barker at the University of Sheffield. Designed to function as a neurodiagnostic tool, the TMS prototype could produce an evoked potential in muscle tissue by activating neurons in the motor cortex. Newer coil designs created more focused magnetic fields that were then used to map regions of cortical involvement in functions such as memory (9), vision (10), and muscle control (11).