Canadian Psychiatric Association

Editorial Credits/ Crédits éditorials

Thank You to the Journal Book Reviewers in 2002 / Merci aux critiques de livres de la Revue en 2002

Thank you to the Journal Manuscript Reviewers in 2002 / Merci aux réviseurs de textes de la Revue en 2002

Subscription Rates /Prix d'abonnements

Advertising Rates / Tarifs publicitaires (PDF)


Editorial
2002—Defining the 21st Century II
Quentin Rae-Grant
(PDF)


Guest Editorial
Twinning Research and Practice Guidelines in the Management of Addictions
Nady el-Guebaly
(PDF)


In Review
Substance Use Disorders: Sex Differences and Psychiatric Comorbidities
Monica L Zilberman, Hermano Tavares, Sheila B Blume, Nady el-Guebaly

(PDF)

Clinical Aspects of Substance Abuse in Persons With Schizophrenia
Juan C Negrete

(PDF)

Are There Cognitive and Behavioural Approaches Specific to the Treatment of Pathological Gambling?
Hermano Tavares, Monica L Zilberman, Nady el-Guebaly

(PDF)


Review Paper
The Relation Between Memory of the Traumatic Event and PTSD: Evidence From Studies of Traumatic Brain Injury
Ehud Klein, Yael Caspi, Sharon Gil

(PDF)

Evolutionary Perspectives on Schizophrenia
Joseph Polimeni, Jeffrey P Reiss

(PDF)


Original Research
Effect of a New Casino on Problem Gambling in Treatment-Seeking Substance Abusers

Tony Toneatto, Donna Ferguson, Judy Brennan

(PDF)

The Thought Disorder Questionnaire
Edward M Waring, RWJ Neufeld, B Schaefer

(PDF)


Brief Communication
The Index Manic Episode in Juvenile-Onset Bipolar Disorder: The Pattern of Recovery

J Rajeev, Shoba Srinath, YCJ Reddy, MG Shashikiran, Satish Chandra Girimaji, Shekhar P Seshadri, DK Subbakrishna

(PDF)

Validation of a French Version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised
Alain Brunet, Annie St-Hilaire, Louis Jehel, Suzanne King

(PDF)


Book Reviews
(PDF)

Psychothérapie individuelle
Reviewed by
Jean-François de la Sablonnière, MD, FRCPC

Psychotherapy
Reviewed by
Paul Ian Steinberg, MD, FRCPC

General Psychiatry
Revue par
David S Goldbloom, MD, FRCPC

Ressources
Revue par
Pierre Doucet


Letters to the Editor
(PDF)

Re: Atypical Antipsychotics Mechanisms of Action

Reply: Atypical Antipsychotics Mechanisms of Action

Re: “Cades Disease” and Beyond

Reply: Cade’s Disease and Beyond

Quetiapine-Induced Leucopenia: Possible Dosage-Related Phenomenon

Atypical Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome With Clozapine and Subsequent Haloperidol Treatment

Brief Communication

The Index Manic Episode in Juvenile-Onset Bipolar Disorder:
The Pattern of Recovery

J Rajeev, MD1, Shoba Srinath, DPM, MD2, YCJ Reddy, DPM, MD3, MG Shashikiran, MD4, Satish Chandra Girimaji, MD5, Shekhar P Seshadri, DPM, MD5, DK Subbakrishna, PhD6

 

Objective: Recent studies of patients with juvenile bipolar disorder report low rates of recovery and high rates of chronicity. However, we lack data on the short-term outcome. This study examines the pattern of recovery from the index episode in an aggressively treated juvenile sample.

Method: We assessed 25 subjects (< 16 years) with a diagnosis of mania, using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-Revised) (DICA-R), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at intake and at 3 and 6 months. We studied the time taken to recover from the index episode, the level of functioning, and the factors predicting them.

Results: After 6 months, 24 (96%) subjects had recovered from the index manic episode. The median time to recovery was 27 days. Total episode length was significantly longer among those with previous affective episodes.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that juvenile-onset mania has high rates of recovery and low rates of chronicity. These differences from the existing literature need further exploration.

(Can J Psychiatry 2003:48:52–55)

Click here for author affiliations.

Clinical Implications

  • Juvenile-onset mania has high recovery rates, which could possibly be due to early and aggressive treatment.

  • Recovery rates for juvenile-onset mania are better in study populations consisting predominantly of adolescents and those with low rates of comorbidity.

  • The high recovery rate is at some variance with the available literature. It is possible that differences in sample characteristics may explain this variance.

Limitations

  • The sample size was small.

  • The sample was not controlled for medication.

  • The rater was not blind to the patients’ clinical and medication status.


Key Words
: bipolar disorder, course, juveniles, children, adolescents, comorbidity

Résumé : L’épisode maniaque de référence marquant l’apparition juvénile du trouble bipolaire : le modèle de rétablissement

Prospective studies of bipolar disorders (BDs) in children and adolescents are few and the findings conflict. While some studies report excellent recovery rates from index bipolar episodes (1,2), other studies report low recovery rates, ranging from 14% to 65% (3–6). No predictors of recovery were identified in any of these studies, with the exception of 1 study that reported longer episodes in those with comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (3).

This study examined the recovery pattern over a period of 6 months in subjects with index manic or mixed affective episodes, assessed their level of global functioning, and attempted to identify predictors of recovery and functioning.

Methods

The sample comprised all the consecutively presenting children and adolescents aged under 16 years who satisfied DSM-III-R criteria for manic or mixed-affective episode. The sample was recruited from the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) Services of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India, between January 1, 1998, and May 31, 1999.

This was a protocol-driven study, and all subjects followed the stated protocol. After we obtained informed consent, we evaluated the subjects and their parents or guardians. Subjects were evaluated initially using a topical format (7) and subsequently using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-Revised (DICA-R) (unpublished), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (9), and the Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) (10). The DICA-R is a revised version of the DICA (8) that follows DSM-III-R diagnosis criteria. We administered the DICA-R to confirm the diagnosis of mania, to identify past episodes of affective illness, to establish first-episode polarity, and to diagnose lifetime comorbid psychiatric conditions. When we interviewed either parent, we used the parent version in addition to the child–adolescent version. The information obtained from all the sources was reviewed, and 2 experienced child psychiatrists established a consensus diagnosis. The subjects were reassessed by the same investigator at 3 and 6 months, using the DICA-R, YMRS, and CGAS. All subjects received the standard treatment prescribed by the CAP Services, which includes monthly follow-ups and counselling regarding the need for regular medication. The study did not control for this.

Recovery from the index episode was defined as the absence of relevant DSM-III-R symptoms or, if present, not more than 2 affective symptoms of mild intensity, with maintenance of the foregoing state for a minimum 8-week interval (1,2). We analyzed the cumulative probability of recovery from the index episode, the level of global functioning, and the predictors of recovery and functioning. The statistical measures selected, based on the sample size, were the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, the log-rank test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA).

Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample

Characteristic (n = 25)

Value

Sex

 

   Female, n (%)

10 (40)

   Male, n (%)

15 (60)

Age at intake (years), mean (SD)

14.1 (1.4)

Age at onset (years), mean (SD)

13.7 (1.7)

Drug-naïve at intake, n (%)

19 (76)

Prepubertal (< 13 years) onset, n (%)

3 (12)

Index episode as first episode, n (%)

16 (64)

First-episode polarity, n (%)

   Manic

   Depressive

   Mixed affective



17 (68)

4 (16)

4 (16)

Type of index episode, n (%)

   Manic

   Mixed affective



21 (84)

4 (16)

Psychotic symptoms, n (%)

   Mood congruent, n (%)

15 (60)

12 (80)

Comorbid psychiatric condition, n (%)

   Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

   Oppositional defiant disorder

   Conduct disorder

   Avoidant disorder of childhood

9 (36)

1 (4)

7 (28)

1 (4)

1 (4)

Hospitalization for the index episode, n (%)

   Duration of hospital stay (days), mean (SD)

20 (80)

28 (21)

Results

Out of 817 patients at the CAP Services newly registered during the study period, 26 subjects had mania (3.2%). One dropped out, and 25 subjects completed the study. For 22 (88%) subjects, this was the first-ever psychiatric consultation. Table 1 gives the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.

All subjects received lithium carbonate for treatment of the index episode, and 21 (84%) continued to receive lithium until the end of the study period. The mean dosage of lithium was 1074 mg daily, and serum level was maintained in the therapeutic range (0.8 to 1.2 mEq/L). Three subjects (12%) did not respond to lithium, and 1 (4%) did not tolerate it. Of the nonresponders, 2 received sodium valproate (mean dosage 1150 mg daily). The subject who did not tolerate lithium received carbamazapine (800 mg daily). In 1 nonresponder, the index episode did not remit during the course of the study. Nonresponse to lithium was defined as < 50% reduction of YMRS scores after at least 4 weeks of lithium treatment at therapeutic levels. Fourteen subjects (56%) needed neuroleptic medication in addition to mood stabilizers. Three (12%) of these patients did not respond to the combination and needed electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). They were given 9 to 11 modified unilateral ECTs on alternate days. All 3 responded to ECT. Clonidine (50 ug daily) was used to treat 1 patient who had comorbid ADHD. All patients continued to receive regular medication until the end of the study period.

All subjects had an acute onset (less than 2 weeks) of the index episode. The median duration at the time of presentation was 30 days (mean 32 days, SD 27). The median total duration of the index episode from onset to recovery was 60 days (mean 70 days, SD 44).

Twenty-four subjects (96%) recovered from the index episode within the 6-month study period . The subject who did not recover was not considered in our calculation of the time to recovery and total duration of episode. The median time to recovery was 27 days, ranging from 4 to 111 days; mean time to recovery was 32 days (SD 27). Following intake, the cumulative probability of recovery at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24 was 24%, 56%, 76%, 80%, 88%, and 96%, respectively.

We used Kaplan–Meier’s survival curve (log-rank test) to analyze the effects of onset-age, prior episodes of affective illness, first-episode polarity, index-episode polarity, psychotic symptoms, YMRS and CGAS intake scores, comorbidity, and hospitalization on the time to recovery from, and the total duration of, the index episode. None of these covariates predicted time to recovery. However, those with prior episodes of affective illness had significantly longer index episodes (mean 105 days vs 53 days) (log-rank test: P2 = 7.23, df 1; P = 0.0072)

The severity of manic symptomatology lessened over the course of the study period, and the level of functioning greatly improved (Table 2).


1 | 2 | 3



CJP Archives in English | Archives RCP en français
Supplements and Position Paper Inserts |
Lignes directrices cliniques, énoncés de principe et communiqués
Author Index to 2002 | Index RCP des auteurs 2002
Subject Index to 2002 | Index RCP des sujets 2002
Information for Contributors | Information à l'intention des auteurs
Style Notes for Contributors
Subscription Rates | Prix d'abonnements
Advertising Rates | Tarifs publicitaires
CPA Home | Page d'accueil