Canadian Psychiatric Association

Editorial Credits/ Crédits éditorials

Subscription Rates /Prix d'abonnements

Advertising Rates / Tarifs publicitaires (PDF)

Guest Editorial
Women’s Mental Health: Focus on Sexual and Reproductive Issues
Ruth Dickson
PDF

In Review
Female Sexual Disorders: Psychiatric Aspects
Robert Taylor Segraves
PDF

Managing Bipolar Disorder During Pregnancy: Weighing the Risks and Benefits
Adele C Viguera, Lee S Cohen, Ross J Baldessarini, Ruta Nonacs

PDF

Review Papers
The Role of Estrogen in Schizophrenia: Implications for Schizophrenia Practice Guidelines for Women

Sophie Grigoriadis, Mary V Seeman

PDF

Should Psychologists Be Granted Prescription Privileges? A Review of the Prescription Privilege Debate for Psychiatrists
Kim L Lavoie, Richard P Fleet

PDF

Original Research
Experiments In Change: Pretrial Diversion of Offenders With Mental Illness

R S Swaminath, J D Mendonca, C Vidal, P Chapman

PDF

Prevalence and Correlates of Elder Abuse and Neglect in a Geriatric Psychiatry Service
Stephen Vida, Richard C Monks, Pascale Des Rosiers

PDF

Brief Communciation
Occupational Effects of Stalking
Karen M Abrams, Gail Erlick Robinson

PDF

Gender-Role Conflict and Suicidal Behaviour in Adolescent Girls
Leora Pinhas, Harriet Weaver, Pier Bryden, Nagi Ghabbour, Brenda Toner

PDF


Book Reviews
(PDF - all reviews)

Comprehensive Care of Schizophrenia: A Textbook of Clinical Management

Drug Addiction and Drug Policy: The Struggle to Control Dependence

At the Side of Torture Survivors: Treating a Terrible Assault on Human Dignity


Letters to the Editor

Gabapentin Treatment of Impulsive-Aggressive Behaviour

Assessing and Managing Compulsive Scratching in Schizophrenia With Chronic Renal Failure

Using the Rating Scale for Psychotic Symptoms to Characterize Delusions Expressed in a Schizophrenia Patient With “Internet Psychosis”

The Ward Changes Address: An Entire Hospital Department Moves to a Modern Building

Sildenafil Citrate for Female Orgasmic Disorder

Suicide Among Immigrants to Canada From the Indian Subcontinent

Fire Fetishism in a Female Arsonist?

In Review

Managing Bipolar Disorder During Pregnancy: Weighing the Risks and Benefits

Adele C Viguera, MD1 , Lee S Cohen, MD2, Ross J Baldessarini, MD3, Ruta Nonacs, MD, PhD4

 

Background: Challenges for the clinical management of bipolar disorder (BD) during pregnancy are multiple and complex and include competing risks to mother and offspring.

Method: We reviewed recent research findings on the course of BD during pregnancy and postpartum, as well as reproductive safety data on the major mood stabilizers.

Results: Pregnancy, and especially the postpartum period, are associated with a high risk for recurrence of BD. This risk appears to be limited by mood-stabilizing treatments and markedly increased by the abrupt discontinuation of such treatments. However, drugs used to treat or protect against recurrences of BD vary markedly in teratogenic potential: there are low risks with typical neuroleptics, moderate risks with lithium, higher risks with older anticonvulsants such as valproic acid and carbamazepine, and virtually unknown risks with other newer-generation anticonvulsants and atypical antipsychotics (ATPs).

Conclusions: Clinical management of BD through pregnancy and postpartum calls for balanced assessments of maternal and fetal risks and benefits.

(Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:426–436)

Clinical Implications

  • Clinical management of bipolar disorder (BD) through pregnancy and the postpartum period calls for balanced assessments of maternal and fetal risks and benefits.

Limitations

  • Information about the course of BD during pregnancy remains limited, and risk of recurrence is not well quantified.
  • Information about the reproductive safety of psychotropic drugs used to treat BD also remains limited, especially for newer drugs commonly employed to treat the disorder.

Key Words: bipolar disorder, women, lithium, anticonvulsants, pregnancy, postpartum, psychosis, teratogenic risk

Résumé: Traitement du trouble bipolaire durant la grossesse : les risques et les avantages


Bipolar, or manic-depressive, disorder (BD) is a serious, recurrent psychiatric illness with a lifetime prevalence well above 1% (1,2). The disorder typically begins in adolescence or early adulthood and tends to be a lifelong condition characterized by high relapse rates, comborbid anxiety and substance use disorders, persistent subsyndromal morbidity and dysfunction, and premature mortality, mainly due to extraordinarily high suicide rates (3–8). Owing to its relatively high prevalence, BD is perhaps the most common idopathic psychotic disorder, but only recently has it been recognized as a major public health problem (2,3,9).

BD represents a significant source of distress, disability, and family burden. Its prevention and treatment are particularly important and complicated for women of reproductive age. Yet, despite its undoubtedly great clinical importance, remarkably little is known about the impact of the female reproductive life cycle—the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, postpartum, nursing, and menopause—on the course and treatment of BD (10). Typically, women diagnosed with the disorder encounter significant obstacles from the professional community with respect to pregnancy. They are often counselled to avoid or terminate pregnancy to prevent fetal exposure to potentially teratogenic medications and to avoid the risk for recurrence of manic or depressive illness (11). Women with BD seeking prepregnancy consultation at a major medical centre were recently surveyed (12). These women wanted advice regarding management of their mood disorder during pregnancy. Of those surveyed, 45% reported that a psychiatrist or other mental health professional had advised them to avoid pregnancy altogether. Following their prepregnancy consultation, 37% decided to avoid pregnancy. The most frequently stated reasons for this decision were fear of adverse effects on fetal development from the medicines and fear that, if treatment were discontinued, the illness would recur.

Physicians caring for pregnant women with BD face a complex clinical challenge: they must minimize risk to the fetus while limiting the impact of maternal morbidity on the mother, her unborn offspring, and her family that might result from potentially severe untreated psychiatric illness. Patients and their clinicians also face the difficult reality that decisions either to use or not to use psychotropic medications can be associated with complications. Deciding what constitutes reasonable risk during pregnancy requires shared responsibility but ultimately rests with the informed patient. Such informed choices, coupled with close psychiatric follow-up and coordinated care with the obstetrician, are components of an emerging model of care aimed at optimizing the clinical management of women with BD during pregnancy.

This overview considers information about the course of BD in pregnancy and about the reproductive safety of established and proposed mood stabilizers. A major aim of this report is to stimulate further discussion and research on this important, complex, and insufficiently considered public health problem for women of childbearing age with BD. We also present tentative guidelines for improved clinical care of such women.


Pregnancy and Recurrence Risk in BD

There is wide agreement that the early postpartum period presents unusually high risk for recurrence of BD and other psychiatric illnesses (13,14). In the mid-19th century, Marcé provided compelling early reports of severe psychotic and affective disorders arising in women during the postpartum period (15). Later, in his classic descriptions of manic-depressive syndrome, Kraepelin observed that attacks of mania and melancholia were common in pregnancy, but even more so following childbirth (16). Modern studies have sustained this general impression that the postpartum period brings high risks of acute psychiatric illness in women with manic-depressive illness. However, the risks associated with pregnancy itself remain less well characterized, and evidence is conflicting as to whether pregnancy alters the risk that major affective illness will recur. Some clinical observations suggest that pregnancy may reduce the risks of acute psychiatric illness and specifically protect against recurrences of BD, major depression, psychotic disorders, and suicide (17–20). Other studies have found rates of psychiatric hospitalization to be either somewhat lower or unchanged during pregnancy, but these studies did not evaluate morbidity in nonhospitalized pregnant women with BD (13,14,21–23).

Grof and colleagues recently suggested that pregnancy has an apparent protective effect on the course of lithium-responsive BD I (with mania) (24). They describe a benign course and even improvement during pregnancy, based on comparisons before and after pregnancy in women whose illness could be managed without mood-stabilizing medication for prolonged periods. They propose that these findings support the view that pregnancy may protect against and prevent recurrences of BD, but the study sample may not represent broader groups of women with BD (25). Moreover, other recent research and growing clinical experience suggest that pregnancy probably does not consistently protect against recurrences of mania or major depression in women with BD. Instead, pregnancy has been found to be a time of substantial risk for relapse, particularly following discontinuation of ongoing mood-stabilizing treatment (25–28). In a large, well-characterized clinical sample, Blehar found that about 45% of women with BD experienced an exacerbation of their illness during pregnancy (29). More recently, Freeman and colleagues also found that at least 50% of a sample of women with BD became symptomatic during pregnancy (30).

We recently studied the course of BD I and BD II (recurrent major depression with hypomania) in a sample of 101 age-matched, pregnant (n = 42) and nonpregnant (n = 59) women who discontinued lithium maintenance treatment. Survival analysis demonstrated that BD recurred in 52% of the pregnant women and 58% of the nonpregnant women, with indistinguishable relapse time-courses (25,26). In contrast, within the preceding year only 21% of the entire sample had experienced a recurrence during ongoing treatment with lithium. Risks were similar with both BD I and II subtypes, but significantly higher for women with a history of 4 or more prior episodes and for women who abruptly or rapidly (< 2 weeks) discontinued lithium treatment proximate to conception.

 

These findings are consistent with the view that either pregnancy may have little effect on recurrence risk in BD or discontinuation of maintenance treatment itself represents a major, and perhaps dominant, stressor (25–36).

These studies seem to suggest that any protective effects of pregnancy on risk for recurrences of mania or depression in women with BD are limited. Moreover, these effects are probably insufficient to protect most patients from recurrence if ongoing maintenance mood-stabilizing treatment is discontinued. To some extent, the risks for recurrence may be predicted by the history of illness or severity, as well as by a history of prolonged wellness or proven ability to tolerate long periods without mood-stabilizing treatment. Clearly, more studies that control specifically for past illness, DSM-IV diagnostic subtypes (I, II, and rapid-cycling), and treatment status are required to clarify the course of BD during pregnancy.


Postpartum Recurrence Risk in BD

Whereas data on the course of BD during pregnancy are sparse, the postpartum period has received more systematic study. This period of the female reproductive cycle has been recognized consistently for more than a century as a time of heightened vulnerability to relapse of mood disorders and acute psychosis, although quantitative specification of that risk has been inconsistent. Recurrence rates within the first 3 to 6 postpartum months among women with BD have ranged from 20% to 80% (15,16,26,28,30,37–42). These rates have been well above 60% (range, 67% to 82%) in more recent studies, perhaps reflecting more reliable diagnosis and greater interest in the problem (26,29,30,42).

BD is also closely associated with postpartum psychosis (13,15,37–48). Several studies have demonstrated that many women presenting with postpartum psychosis later develop BD (13,15, 37–48). Postpartum psychosis is a rare condition in the general population, with an estimated prevalence in postpartum women of 0.1% to 0.2%. However, for women with BD, the risk is perhaps 100 times higher, at 10% to 20% (13,39,42). Postpartum psychosis is characterized by rapid onset of symptoms—often within the first 48 to 72 hours after delivery. The disorder may present with delirium, but it is often indistinguishable from a manic or mixed manic-depressive episode with psychotic features. Postpartum psychosis is a psychiatric emergency associated with high risk of infanticide and potential suicide; it requires immediate treatment with a mood stabilizer and antipsychotic agent or electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), usually in an inpatient setting (39,40,43–48). Following an episode of such illness, risk for a recurrent episode of postpartum psychosis with a subsequent pregnancy is estimated to be as high as 90% (43–45).

Several investigators have evaluated the ability of treatment to attenuate the high postpartum risk for recurrence of BD or acute psychosis (43–49). Most of this research has been limited to use of lithium prophylaxis. When lithium was given either several weeks prior to delivery or immediately postpartum, the risk for postpartum recurrences of BD was reduced on average by two- to fivefold, compared with untreated women (17,43–49). These reports leave important questions unanswered, including those of optimal dose and treatment timing and the comparative efficacy of lithium vs other mood stabilizers. A preliminary study of 11 women with BD found that introducing the anticonvulsant divalproex shortly after delivery resulted in fewer recurrences than observed in otherwise similar, but untreated, women (49). In view of the very limited research on this important problem, further systematic study of perinatal and postpartum prophylaxis with anticonvulsants, atypical antipsychotics (ATPs), and nonpharmacologic interventions is urgently needed.


Potential Risks of Pharmacotherapy in Pregnancy

Clinicians face particularly urgent challenges when a woman with BD plans to conceive or becomes pregnant. Information accumulated in recent decades suggests that some psychotropic drugs may be safe for use during pregnancy (50–55). Nevertheless, knowledge regarding the risks of prenatal exposure to psychotropic medications remains far from complete.

All psychotropics diffuse readily across the placenta, and no psychotropic drug has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use during pregnancy. For obvious ethical reasons, it is not possible to conduct randomized placebo-controlled studies on medication safety in pregnant women. Accordingly, most information about the reproductive safety of drugs derives from case reports, case series, and retrospective studies. Very few reports involve prospective designs (56,57). To guide physicians seeking information about the reproductive safety of various prescription drugs, the FDA has established a system that classifies medications into 5 risk categories (A, B, C, D, and X), based on data derived from human and animal studies. Category A medications are designated as safe for use during pregnancy (no psychotropics have this rating), while Category X drugs are contraindicated by having demonstrated fetal risks that outweigh any benefit to the patient. Drugs in Categories B to D are considered to have intermediate risks, which are greatest in category D. Most psychotropic drugs are classified as Category C agents for which adequate human studies are lacking and risk cannot be ruled out. This classification system is often ambiguous, inaccurate, and misleading. In fact, the Teratology Society recommends that the FDA pregnancy categories be deleted from drug labelling and replaced with narrative statements summarizing and interpreting available data on teratogenic risk (58). At present, physicians must rely on other sources of information when recommending the use of psychotropic medications during pregnancy (50–55).